Katie Maloney and Tom Schwartz share a moment during the reunion
The frosty relationship between Vanderpump Rules stars Katie Maloney And Tom Schwartz It started to thaw a little during Season 11. The former couple managed to laugh it off when Katie reached out to Schwartz’s good friend, Max Boyens. But Schwartz overstated his situation when he asked for a one-night stand…to browse their phones in bed and eat junk food.
However, Schwartz finally admitted the mistake he made in their marriage. When asked to name three things he could have done better, he replied: “Let her feel her feelings and validate them, before he tries to confront them with logic. I think I would be a better listener. “Don’t get drunk and interact with strangers on a regular basis,” Schwartz added. Notably, he was the only member of the Pump Rules cast to congratulate Katy and Ariana Madix on the long-awaited opening of their sandwich shop, Something About Her.
Sweet moment between ex Bubbas
According to The Daily Dish, there was an unseen moment between the former couple that was aired in the extended, uncensored version of the final part of the Season 11 reunion. This version is streaming on Peacock. Host Andy Cohen asked Schwartze if Katie was the one “that got away?”
“No, I’m completely at peace with our decision to separate,” he replied. “That doesn’t mean I don’t cry from time to time,” he said through tears. “And I miss you.” Katie also became emotional and replied, “Sorry.”
“It was the right decision, but I’m still in love with the best moments we had together. We had 13 years. I don’t consider it a failure,” Schwartz said. “I’ve had so many great moments with you, Katie, and I still love you. But it was the right decision to separate.”
Katie had an equally nice response. “I don’t look at it as time wasted or taken from me at all. It’s been for the best,” she said. Where’s Cringley when I need him?
You can stream Vanderpump Rules on Peacock.
TELL US – What do you think of Schwartz and Katie’s comments? Are you happy that they are friends again?
